Labels

Sunday, June 30

A B-Horror Movie Reivew of: Oasis of the Zombies (1982)

Finally an actual horror movie! This week I sat through Oasis of the Zombies, and I'm going to tell you right now: it isn't that great.

The movie is about a group of college kids that go in search of Nazi gold in a oasis, however that oasis is haunted by Zombies: the very same Nazi's that died there transporting the gold. The movie starts out like any other horror movie: with two chicks that have nothing to do with the story and are also kind of slutty. They just happened to be out in the middle of the dessert looking for an oasis, and as they walk around they start to hear strange sounds. Shortly after they are ambushed by zombies, but not before the camera followed them from behind, if you know what I mean. 

Then cut to the actual plot. There is an oasis where Nazis gold is buried, and its worth $6 Million dollars! The Nazi troops where intercepted by other troops and the fight killed everyone except for one soldier, who is the only one that knows where the gold is. This soldier is also the father of our main protagonist, who upon hearing of his father's death (yeah he gets killed by some poison) decides to go in search of this gold.

Overall the movie is really long and boring, there are big chunks where nothing happens and could had been easily cut out. The acting is so terrible! To the point were you wonder if they are even trying. The Zombies also look bad, most look like their face where plastered with paper mache, others just look bad. They also have a problem with light, most scenes are too dark to make sense of anything (although this might be because of the low quality of the film). There are also some night scenes that where obviously shot during the day, you can see the sky and its bright blue! but that just contrast with the rest of the shot, so again you can't see much. The music is also really "off" in a bad way, I felt like all music was in the wrong movie, oh well.

But this movie at least has one thing going for it: people get killed. One specially good death happens when this chick gets eaten by zombies in the first half of the movie. The zombies took the time to rip all of her clothes off before digging into her flesh, and there is one shot of meat being pulled out from her, not that great of a shot, but the gore is appreciated. All the other deaths are boring, mostly due to the poor acting and un-convincing screams. 

Final thoughts on Oasis of the Zombies: Its boring. Its hard to watch, you loose interest quickly, and to be honest the ending is not even remotely worth it. The acting is weak, the cinematography is weak, the zombies are lame, and all this adds up to a mediocre film. I did like that the camels had their own zoom-in head shots, I have no idea why I picked up on that.

Movie Score: 
  • 2/10
  • T (O.W.L.)

Monday, June 24

The Last of Us Review


Set around the year 2033, The Last of Us offers a glimpse into the broken and brittle nation after a mysterious infection has raptured America for nearly two decades.

Cities are in disrepair, threaded together only by overgrown vines and erupting greenery. Walled off government-controlled checkpoints, raiders, anarchic rebel forces and no-named communities left on the fringes of a decayed nation are the few and last bastions of humanity. The infected, humans who have been corrupted by the mysterious fungal infection and thus turned into raging husks of their former selves, roam everywhere else. Few places are truly safe.

Road to Ruin

The Last of Us truly begins when Joel and his partner-in-crime, Tess, set out to retrieve their stolen guns. However, the initial mission that ended abruptly presents a better opportunity. Marlene, the leader of the rebel Firelfly group hellbent on returning American government to its past glory, asks Joel and Tess to escort a girl, Ellie, to a nearby base. Left in the dark on details, Joel and Tess soon unravel Ellie's significance in their forlorn world and fight their way through hordes of infected and desperate survivors.

Ellie
A survivor born amidst the infection, Ellie soon becomes the focal point within The Last of Us. Her demeanor is as tough as her wonder for the world before the decay is high. Naughty Dog crafted a character that's very likable, capable and funny, but her persona is brought to life by the voice actors.

Voice actress Ashley Johnson does a stellar performance in crafting Ellie's naivete and wonderment. However, saying that her performance alone propels The Last of Us to a higher degree of quality would be a wrong presumption. Ellie's little quips aimed at her allies, the tirade of "fuck you(s)" shouted at hunters and those moments of angst held in silence form a cohesive relationship with not only other characters, but the dire world painted in The Last of Us. Nonetheless, it is in tandem with Troy Baker's dark and brutal Joel where players see the most natural connection between characters. Their time spent together across America highlights a growing friendship and reverberates the warmth of hope these characters are searching for. The time and detail spent creating these personas beautifully weave players into the broken world.

What will further draw players into The Last of Us is its powerful narrative. Each moment in this post-apocalyptic universe is one of survival. The term "survival" though takes many faces: greed, hunger, companionship, murder,  isolation, or desperation. Morality is only a facade to a survivor. And the decayed nation turns a blind eye to all. The Last of Us basks in these morality-questioning moments and throws Joel and Ellie into the middle of them. Within the story's frame, Naughty Dog uses abrupt, yet confident hard cuts in its narrative. Though these moments leave burning questions, they grip and stylistically writhe the player into the next segment.

Survive at all cost
The tone and power of any video game narrative can be broken through the dissonance between a protagonist's plight and player control. Such a problem does not exist in The Last of Us. The brutality and survivor-mindset is mirrored perfectly in its gameplay.

Stealth works as a slow, tense hum. Players can slowly creep around corners and throw objects to incapacitate enemies silently, use bottles and bricks laying around to distract infected or even sneak past enemies completely. Joel and Ellie are more than often outnumbered and outgunned, so a direct confrontation can prove fatal for the tandem many times over. Precision and timing are the utmost importance in stealth as enemy survivors and infected are deadly in not only ammo and power, but numbers. As Joel says to Ellie, "Our luck is bound to run out sometime." This sentiment perfectly applies to the tide of battle.

One wrong move will change the pace of combat instantly. That hum of stealth will swell into a frantic fight or flight moment because one alerted enemy could equal several infected suddenly running after the player.

This will not end well.

Combat in The Last of Us is quick, dangerous and versatile. Despite an ever growing arsenal throughout the campaign, which includes a shotgun, revolver and a bow, conflicts may evolve past the typical shooter-archetypes.This is due to the crafting mechanic. Picking through essential parts and pieces, Joel can craft items and weapons, such as smoke-bombs or shivs, to suit any situation. However, crafting items occur in real time and does not stop the game nor its enemies. Having Joel sift through his backpack mid-battle to craft or look for items is not only dangerous, but can also prove fatal. This layer of detail further adds to the intensity, immersion and versatility of combat. At anytime, guns, traps, avoidance and even reemerging into stealth are all viable options in the majority of conflicts.

Combat in The Last of Us immerses players further into the broken world because, like Joel, Ellie and everyone else in the game, the means to fight stems from a raw, brutal, yet improvisational urge to survive. This is one game that beautifully weaves and balances stealth and action into a synergistic flow.
Yeah, there IS a multiplayer mode....

Surprisingly, The Last of Us has a mlutiplayer mode; and surprisingly, many mechanics from the single-player campaign actually make it into the online realm, including the real-time crafting mechanic. Called "Factions," multiplayer takes on two variations of team deathmatch: Survival and Supply Raid. Both game types are a standard four versus four deathmatch, but the former is grounded in eliminations while the latter has both teams stocked at twenty lives and the first team to drop down zero lives, loses.

Unlike most shooters, the Factions multiplayer mode, very much like the campaign, is slow and methodical. While players may choose to run and gun throughout the map like a crazed Clicker, Factions allows cohesive teams to sneak and flank their way through seven campaign-inspired maps. The Last of Us' emphasis lies with its campaign, but Factions provides a fun respite from it.

The fifteen hour campaign draws, immerses and keeps the attention of those who brave the broken streets in this gritty tale. Naughty Dog has excelled in creating a world and narrative so gripping and dark that it is only matched by the excellent balance and versatility of raw action and stealth. Technologically, there were very few problems with The Last of Us. There were a few moments where Ellie or other supporting characters would run obliviously in-front of an enemy and  be totally ignored. The shooting mechanic in both single and multiplayer, while solid, can feel a bit clunky and sometimes awkward. But given the scope and magnitude of The Last of Us, these issues are easily forgivable.

Naughty Dog crafted this game as close to perfection as possible. The Last of Us hits the PS3 on the verge of a new generation of consoles. However despite its latency, Naughty Dog proves there is still purpose in the current generation through the game's brutal combat, fantastic visuals, the hard-hitting, grim narrative and its spectrum of characters.

The Last of Us gets a 5/5.

Pick up your copy immediately and Stay tuned for Subculture!

Sunday, June 23

A B-Movie Review of Triassic Attack (2010)

This weekend I was out of the country, and Netflix does not have a b-horror section in Mexico. So what I did was to simply go to horror and chose a movie that looked interesting based on the name and poster, Triassic Attack was the winner.


Lets start off by saying that this movie is a SyFy Original. You know what you are getting into with those movies. I could not have been more excited when I saw the SyFy logo come up. But in the way B-Movies often work, my excitement quickly turned into frustration as I had to watch the first act of the movie. The acting in this movie is not bad, but it isn't great either. And I'm supposed to believe this guy is part Native American? I am also positive they have a British actor just for the accent. But lets forget about the casting decisions and talk about the plot. 

A small town university is trying to expand their campus by building new facilities. The problem is that the want to build on Native American sacred land. The owner of the Native American museum sets it on himself to save his heritage, so he calls on the ancient spirits for help. And help does arrive, in the form of...you guessed it: Dinosaur Fossils! The Dino-fossils wreck havoc around town, and must be stopped. If that is not enough to make you watch this movie, then I don't know what will.

In regards to the animations, the Dino-fossils are pretty bad. Sometimes you can see the outline were they put them in; other times, like when the Dino-fossil grabs a person (and one time a cow), you can clearly tell it was done without much care. I'm serious! Triassic Attack has some of the worst CGI I've seen. On the flip side the T-Rex (of course there is a T-Rex!) looks solid and is easily the most polished Dino-fossil in the entire movie. The Dinosaurs are also really bad ass. I wont spoil much, but there's a scene  where I was really shocked and at the same time made the T-Rex eleven times more awesome.

At the end of it all, Triassic Attack delivers in all the right spots, combining dinosaurs with the undead and the Native American curse to create some of the best B-Movie monster flicks. The characters where the weakest part of the movie, and some of the "comedy" is cringe worthy, but you can get over that and enjoy a good old-fashioned Dino-fossil rampage. 

Movie Score:
  • 7/10
  • A (O.W.L.)

Tuesday, June 18

The Hangover Part III - A Review & Why You Should Go Watch It

   Hey there folks, here at Subculture Times we like to keep things fresh, and sometimes we could use another point of view on movies other than rants (reviews). Now I gladly present my reviewing skills, although I am in no way a professional critic and/or should be listened to.

Hangover Part III

   Going in to see Hangover 3, I started to reminisce about the original movie and all the good points about it. Those memorable moments that really had me laughing out loud, like the cameo of famed boxer Mike Tyson and his tiger, to the pictures of that long forgotten night that no one could remember. Then I remembered Hangover 2, and recalled all the setups and moments that made the movie stale since it just repeated the formula for the original

   The movie starts off with Alan literally driving his father to death, and after his funeral, his family and friends host an intervention for him. Doug (Justin Bartha) suggest that the wolfpack take him to a rehab center in Arizona, with Phil (Bradley Cooper) and Stu (Ed Helms) reluctantly accepting on the premise that Alan gets help. On the way the wolfpack gets attacked by unknown men wearing pig masks and end up getting kidnapped, only to find out that a man named Marshall (John Goodman) wants Mr. Chow (Ken Jeong) so he can find out what Chow did with the gold that was stolen from him. After taking Doug hostage, he sends the wolfpack to bring back his gold, along with Mr. Chow. Without spoiling too much, the search brings them back to Las Vegas to finish the trilogy.


   Thankfully this movie did not only beat out its predecessor in story and laughs, but also added suspense and drama to the mix, as this time not only do they know that their friend is being held hostage, but that this man will die if they do not deliver Chow. The laughs were very well balanced with all the twists and turns going on in the story. The acting was just as good as the original, and more than makes up for the blunder of the previous movie. All in all, this movie definitely deserves a visit to the theater or a buy if you want to wait. 

Movie Score:
  • 8/10
  • E -Exceeds Expectations (O.W.L.)



Sunday, June 16

A B-Horror Movie Review of Return of the Killer Tomatoes (1988)

I like watching b-horror movies, both for the horrible effects, and the even worse acting! So every Saturday I will watch a b-horror movie on Netflix (go to genres\horror\sub-genres\b-horror), and give you a review on Sunday! You are welcome.
I will also do no background research or get informed about the movie, all I know is the title.

This week I watched "Return of the Killer Tomatoes" and it was unexpected. Although its on the b-horror section, its really just a comedy movie. Another surprise was that George Clooney is in this!


The movie is about a mad scientist that invents a way to make tomato people, and a tomato girl that runs away to save his deformed tomato brother. Anyways I'm not sure if this is actually a sequel to any movie, but it looked like it was. 

The first sequence is pretty funny, and then the title sequence has a song that explains the first movie or something, that was ok. So instantly you know this is just a goofball comedy movie type of thing. They also mention that the movie is low budget, and they break the 4th wall often (one to many times if you ask me). The movie is very tongue-in-cheek, telling you over and over again that they have low budget, and poking fun at it. There a whole scene where they stop the movie to inform everyone that they run out of money... yeah its that kind of movie.

About 3/4 of the way I felt like the movie dragged on, nothing had happened in the plot, and it just came to a very slow pace. It picked up at the end, but then it still dragged on for too long. The plot is not that strong, and the comedy moments are not that great. I never busted out laughing.
I was looking for a bad horror movie (which can sometimes be good), and instead ended up with a bad comedy movie (which are hard to watch). So no, I didn't like this movie. But if you like b-grade comedy movies I would say this is right up you alley.

Movie Score:
  • 3/10
  • T (O.W.L.)

Wednesday, June 12

A Movie Review of The Purge (2013) and Welcome Back!

They are back! Yes they are! Movie Reviews!
Because you requested them! (not really)

Here at Subculture Times, we like to give you more content! and we are going to bring back our written content, because I know you are tired of those pesky videos (which you can check out over HERE).

Before I start my rant... I mean... review, I feel like I need to give my little disclaimer to everyone reading:
All I ask is that you keep in mind that I AM NOT a professional critic of any sort, and all my reviews mean nothing. I write not to tell you that something is good, or terrible; but simply to share my opinion.
Read with an open mind and feel free to contact me and tell me how wrong I am about everything.
So with that out of the way, lets get to the review!

A Movie Review of The Purge (2013)

In a the very near future, the US Government has implemented what the call "The Purge", which is an annually held, 12-hour period, where there are no laws and people can commit any crimes with no repercussions, even murder. Great premise! The movie is about a family that is being attacked by a group of people, for protecting the group's target for the purge.

It is the night of the purge, and the Sandin family are ready to lock down for the night. Everything seems to go according to plan, until the youngest son Charlie hears a man yelling for help outside on the streets. In Charlie's infinite wisdom, he decides to let this stranger into the house. Soon after there is a group outside demanding the family give them their "kill for the night" and insist that they will not hesitate to break in and kill everyone. It is the purge after all.

This movie is not great. I'm not saying don't go watch it, I'm saying don't expect much from it. First of all, most of the actors are not that great. And that antagonist! I wont spoil The Purge, but I found his acting a little over the top. And speaking of antagonist, "wearing a mask" is so cliche, I feel they could had done away with it completely. Beside the acting I also noticed that they kept using close-up shots, maybe to convey that they are trapped. I also saw this movie on the bottom rows so everything was up close, but the comment stands. Shaky camera and cheesy jump scares round off this not-so-great movie.

But not all is bad. Ethan Hawke gave a great performance and is easily the best part of the movie. There is some good suspense towards the middle, and also some good gore moments that the horror fan in me really enjoyed. I feel like the end was really solid, and you can feel the tone of the movie change as the sun rises. One last thing i want to comment on is the way the news serve to explain a little about how the purge came to be; and the psychological aspect of it, as well as the economic ramifications that it has had on the american society. I thought that was a neat way to explain it without having to stop the plot or interrupt it at some point.

Overall The Purge is just another suspense movie, with a healthy amount of killings at the end. Its a fun movie, but not a great movie. This is a type a movie you watch a year or two after it comes out, and you go "Hey! that movie looked interesting" It is a good idea, a decent execution, but at then end a very forgettable film. 
Movie Score: 

  • 7/10 
  • P (O.W.L. Standards, its a Harry Potter thing, look it up)